The outcome presented quantities of PCM notably dependent on the kind regarding dating (H(2) = ; p =
Moral Factors
All of the moral items was basically protected, according to the direction out of Quality Zero. of one’s Ministry off Wellness. Its run are approved by the Ethics and you will Search Chamber out of the latest Centro de- Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas of your Universidade Government would Rio de- Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you may Method Zero. 3.). For the front-page of on the internet questionnaire, discover the fresh Free and Informed Concur Label (FICT), and that shown factual statements about the dangers and you may advantages of answering this new research, therefore the be certain that out of withdrawal of concur, versus bias as well as when. Solely those people which seemed the fresh concur solution had webblänk usage of the study blogs. People who don’t read the consent solution was basically redirected to the termination of the new questionnaire.
To investigate you can easily differences in PCM and you can NCM, according to sociodemographic variables: sex, field, proper care of young sisters, visibility or lack of a partner, and having or not which have pupils, reviews anywhere between organizations have been made by using the Mann-Whitney You shot ( Dining table step one).
In the 1st, the connection between PCM and you may NCM is actually examined therefore is unearthed that PCM (Yards = ; DP = ) correlates negatively on NCM (M = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
A couple of Spearman correlations was in fact presented. 000; r = -.494; r 2 = .24. In the 2nd analysis this new matchmaking ranging from PCM, NCM and you can sixteen individual and contextual variables was indeed examined and certainly will get noticed within the Table dos. Weakened associations was indeed found each other positive and negative anywhere between PCM or NCM and you may a dozen of your own variables checked-out. Specifically the latest sociodemographic details: “number of sisters” and you can “delivery buy” therefore the identity facts: “conscientiousness” and you will “transparency playing” showed zero extreme correlations which have PCM and you will NCM.
