A beneficial Logico-Linguistic Inquiry Into Fundamentals out-of Physics: Area We
Nevertheless, they stays available to how reader refers to so it performs, which is the essence away from emptiness
Scientific analysis, try out methods, overall performance and you may perceptions is actually devised on the head, plus creative imagination and you may phrase and you can concept programming. Ideal reporting out-of results is also crucial. Particularly in theoretic physics, linguistic expertise and you may carefulness if you’re composing are receiving a very clicking you would like for the the fresh new victims within perspectives away from present degree. There are folks from most other areas who are prepared to get me wrong and you may ignite too many discourses/conclusions; it produce instructions off several bytes of data such as “yes/no/maybe”; thus, nonscience or occult misinformation exists, examples of and that abound from the fields of special relativity theory and quantum physics. Hence, technology ought not to make use of the sentences one to supported the latest Paleolithic head. Category: Standard Research and you can Thinking
Trappist-1 Superstar Program
The new James Webb Place Telescope (JWST) will quickly transcend exactly what the Hubble has been capable explore. One of their very first goals will be brand new TRAPPIST-step 1 superstar program for the Aquarius. Which article examines as to the reasons one puny reddish dwarf is really interesting, and exactly why the look for alien existence models age. Category: General Research and you may Beliefs
Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of STD Sites dating sites <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy
