This would in reality not an issue with this design; Sir John de- Keith d
Re: ? Comyn partner out of Malise
Concerning the Comyn daughter who was simply wife off Malise of Strathearn, I’d theorized inside 2005 you to she had been Margaret, identified as partner out-of Sir John de Keith (select copy from post below) who was 2ndly elizabeth are provided where article: the fresh new spouse Emma I will suggest was of another nearest and dearest, and never mom of the 2nd Earl Malise.
Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , says to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn, got a partner Emma, when you look at the 1261-1267, whose surname is unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. regarding Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a little while just before 1270, with the intention that his widow (Margaret) would have been “available” some time just after Emma.
This was needless to say a speculation; it does have the benefit of working with a well-known relationship ranging from Muriel Keith and you can Reginald ce Cheyne. More associated documents would needless to say end up being allowed.
The account from inside the Scots Peerage regarding family of Keith claims from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) which he is considered keeps married Comyn, earl from Buchan . So it personality, of uncertain (“said to was indeed”) assortment, may now be remedied based on the adopting the dispensation, dated during the Fondi towards fourteen The month of january 1378/9::
‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Toward bishop away from Moray. Professors to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, of Moray and Aberdeen dioceses, from the impediment so you can relationship arising from the 3rd and you can last degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘
Muriel Keith, the future 2nd spouse off Robert Stewart, initially Duke of Albany (d. 1420), was developed so you’re able to marry Reginald ce Cheyne, young buck out-of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by the their partner (because the their earliest husband), Helen regarding Strathearn. If you are you can find popular gaps regarding origins away from Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald ce Cheyne would show an origin on the Comyns. But not, this really is too distant to require an excellent dispensation if Muriel are a-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which may become case when the is why child.
dos. Reginald ce Cheyne are an excellent-grandson of Marjory Comyn, child regarding Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), child out of William Comyn in the list above. Their own son are Malise, Earl out of Strathearn away from 1312 in order to their demise inside 1328 , and you may father out of Reginald.
california. 1270), is identical to Marjory Comyn, and married 2ndly in order to Malise, Earl off Strathearn (d. 1312). This will indicate the fresh new parentage a€?considered enjoys been’ regarding Margaret, wife regarding Sir John de Keith, are away hur man gifter sig med en utlГ¤ndsk flicka from one age bracket: she would n’t have been this new d Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, but rather regarding his young buck Alexander. There’s absolutely no proof you to Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn have been married far ahead of 1275: given that Lindsay composed,
There is you to definitely discernable basis about what the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith could have stayed: if the Margaret Comyn, wife out of Sir John de- Keith (d
‘ The new wife of earl, on the 1275, is titled Marjory, even as we comprehend the attesting clause away from Zero. cv., and that’s stated from the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. man. vi., to have come the second cousin regarding John Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, whom discussed on the part of Earl Malise the marriage settlement more than stated [dated on London, April twenty six, 1293 for their child Matilda and you can Robert de Tony, son regarding Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E out-of Buchan I __________________I________________ I III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als I E out of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I I I We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de Keith Age out of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony We ______I_______________________ We I We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E away from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V We We de Graham Sir William de I We__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We We III We I I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke out of Albany)
